Hip Resurfacing Vs Hip Replacement 2016

How does it compare to conventional hip replacement.

Hip resurfacing vs hip replacement 2016.

Results from long term data show that it can last just as long or longer than traditional hip replacement in young high demand patients especially men. Since its fda approval in 2006 more than 3 000 hip. Hip resurfacing a procedure that improves the function of your own hip joint may be a viable alternative to total hip replacement surgery. Hip resurfacing is a less invasive form of joint replacement surgery which is advised to only selected individuals.

Hip resurfacing is an alternative technology to total hip replacement that is aimed at treating painful conditions of the hip in younger active patients. In a conventional hip replacement the pain from a diseased hip is relieved by replacing the ball and the socket. Importantly hip resurfacing needn t be looked at as a temporary procedure inevitably leading to hip replacement down the road. This article talks about some of the major differences between hip resurfacing and total hip replacement.

The birmingham hip resurfacing is the answer to younger patients with severe hip pain due to arthritis. Hip resurfacing is a less invasive approach to hip replacement and involves removing only the affected portions of the hip joint. Unlike traditional hip replacement surgery resurfacing does not remove as much of your leg bone.