Hip Replacement Anterior Versus Posterior Approach

There are actually a variety of hip replacement approaches including.

Hip replacement anterior versus posterior approach.

Anterior approach posterior approach direct superior approach anterolateral approach and direct lateral approach. The advantage is thought to be that rehabilitation can proceed more quickly by not having to allow the reattached muscle to heal. During this traditional approach the orthopedic surgeon makes an 8 10 inch while you lie on your side. The long term outcome is very good.

These differences can have short term and possibly long term effects on patients. The key phrase here is well placed i used the posterior approach for all hip replacements i performed from 1983 until late in 2013. Posterior hip replacement surgery is the traditional approach but it takes you longer to heal. From that point on i have used the anterior approach to hip replacement almost exclusively for primary hip replacement and have even used it on selective revision surgery.

This is done by replacing the damaged or diseased bone with a metal or plastic implant which is designed to replicate a healthy hip joint. The most obvious difference between anterior and posterior hip replacement surgeries is the location of the incisions. Anyone with a painful or deteriorating hip should ask their doctor about anterior vs. Posterior hip replacements for patients with osteoarthritis or that have experienced trauma to their hip a total hip replacement can restore function and decrease pain.

The anterior approach hip replacement is a muscle splitting approach meaning that the surgeon gets to the hip between two muscles rather than by removing and then reattaching a muscle. Anterior hip replacement surgery is the new less invasive procedure but fewer physicians perform this surgery. Over the years each approach has had its day in the sun. The surgical steps of an anterior approach hip replacement differ from the steps of the posterior approach.